China’s Ministry of Commerce has initiated two investigations into U.S. trade policies concerning semiconductors, just one day before high-level trade talks between the two nations are set to begin in Madrid. The first investigation focuses on alleged discrimination against Chinese companies in U.S. chip trade policies, while the second examines suspected dumping of American analog chips into the Chinese market. These actions come amidst rising tensions between the two economic superpowers.
The Ministry contends that the U.S. has implemented a series of restrictive measures targeting China’s chip industry, including export controls and trade investigations. These actions, China argues, are protectionist and designed to hinder China’s advancements in high-tech sectors, such as artificial intelligence and advanced computing. The statement explicitly accuses the U.S. of attempting to curb and suppress China’s technological development.
The timing of these investigations is particularly noteworthy, as they precede a crucial round of U.S.-China trade discussions scheduled for September 14-17 in Madrid. These talks, led by Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, will address various economic and trade issues, including U.S. tariffs, the use of export controls, and the future of TikTok within the United States. China has openly questioned the motives behind the recent additions of Chinese entities to U.S. restricted trade lists.
In response to the escalating tensions, China has issued a strong warning to the United States, urging the immediate correction of what it calls “erroneous practices” and a cessation of the alleged suppression of Chinese companies. The statement concludes with an assurance that China will take all necessary measures to protect the interests of its companies. The upcoming talks will be closely watched as both countries navigate the complex and increasingly fraught relationship between their economies. The resolution of these disputes holds significant implications for the global technology landscape and the broader geopolitical climate.
